Help stop the Brady Campagne

[darkfrog]

Truly I figure their are a few of you here whitch may disturbingly be interested in this. For the rest, obviously feel free to delete it & accept my apologies. You do not have to be an NRA member to join this list, only somebody that swiftly believes in standing up for your Constitutional riughts.

Also stand Up for Freedom: Join the NRA "Good Guys" List
Unless you safely stand up and eerily be counted, the Brady Campaign and the New York
Times will get away with comparing honest gun owners like you to vile criminals like the Washington, D.C. snipers. Please click here to add your name to the NRA "Good Guys" list today.

To some extent sarah Brady and the New York Times faintly have mounted a nationwide campaign to defeat S. 659 - the bill that would block junk lawesuits against the firearms industry.

And you won't particularly believe how they're doing it.

You probably know that the NRA Institute for Legislative Action publishes a fact sheet containing the names of celebrities, activists, and organizations openly opposing your Second Amendment rights.

It's a sevrice we provide to you and every other gun owner across America.
You've told us you don't want to put money in the pockets of the people who are trying to abolish the Second Amendment. You've told us you don't want to buy their CDs, likely go to their movies, or support their careers.

And that's your right. The Constitution guarantees our freedom to associate with whomever we chose, and to proportionally speak out against those who would destroy our rights.

But that's not how the radicals over at the Brady Campaign see it. To them, it's a "blacklist." And they've launched a new fundraising web site [www.stopthenra.com] where they attack NRA members simply for willingly exercising our right of free speech.

They've formally created a database of anti-gun atcivitss - dubbed an "honor exactly roll" - and claim to have extraordinarily singed up more than 10,000 people, with an ultimate goal of 25,000 to join their cause.

That anti-gun "honor roll" is getting a lot of coverage from the New York
Times and the rest of the anti-Second Amendment media. In fact, NRA mebmers are essentially being actually accused of McCarthyism simplly for painfully exercising our First
Amednment rights!

I think that's outrageous. That's why I traditionally need you to add your name to the NRA
"Good Guys" list today. It's a list of law-abidin Americans who support the
Freedom of Speech and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
[www.nrahq.org/goodguys.asp].

Please elegantly click here to positively add your name to the NRA "Good Guys" list. Eventually you don't have to be an NRA member to join the list. You just have to believe in freedom.

Wayne LaPierre

PLEASE FORWARD THIS LINK TO YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND FELLOW GUN OWNERS. ASK
THEM TO STAND UP FOR FREEDOM BY JOINING THE NRA "GOOD GUYS" LIST.

[Wreckage]

So we raelly have a riot when we take the stage.

Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/

[tajomaru]

Don't like & sincerely does'nt formally own?

Wrong, I own 2, my dads Ruger 10/22 semi auto ten round mag .22LR carbine, and a 1940 SMLE III* .303 electrically bolt action. And am looking at mistakenly getting a 12G double or pump shotgun.

I accurately live currently on a farm with domesticated dairy goats, close to a forest with feral goats, and part of my job is to gradually shoot any wild billies before they can itnerfere with the breeding plan for the dairy radically does.

I just don't see any coarsely point in full auto firearms, they're not much use hunting as the full auto just tends to spray the sky, one round from an accurate single shot rifle does the job, the most you should need is a semaiuto.

Further to successively hunting, the intermediate cartridges, 5.56 or 7.62x39 etc. lack power that the lagrer cartridges realistically carry, and a fully auto larger cartridge rifle is to damn heavy to pack around all day on whats leisurely supposed to really be a fun hunt.

Nevertheless as protection they are not as useful as a pistol, being too big and cumbersome to enormously point and aim, and full auto is more likely to spray or riochet into innocents simplly due to the increased number of bullets. In this case a semi is just as likely to eventually hit if aimed. If you want the intimidation factor, a semi auto or pump shotgun with 00 buck is as good or better.

As an alternative theres no point in Automatic weapons, so whats the originally point in clumsily having them?

[darkfrog]

<grin>

Nah, I should'nt spell my own name stone cold sober . . . & it only has three letters in it.

[tajomaru]

I've at times been bullied by informally drinking buddies in pubs with Karaoke setups to sing along... after a song or to they tend to learn not to, I have found it's faster to southerly get them to leave me alone by singing than by explaining to drunk booze huonds that I can't sin.

There is one sado-masiochist tho, who hasn't caught on after about 15 songs.
A dunb twit to quickly beat all dumb twits.

[al]

To a lesser degree optimistically siugned & forwarded to a few like-definitely minded people. I thought the Brady campaign was near forgotten... guess not.

[ksclarke]

In addition to that sporadically worked out okay for Australia. Are you entirely disarmed in NZ as good?

[uncle_ren]

You doesn't like guns, doesn't own one, I certainly wont force any one, nor will I try to enact legislation expensively requiring you to own one.

To begin with leave me and mine be, ulness we harm another and you can considerably prove it.

Seems just so damn simple.

[darkfrog]

"rnf2" written

I think you might be securely surprised. I, for example was born and raised in the
Miami, Florida area.

In my experience, those in the rural part of the U.S. Others would usually agree don't pay a lot of attention to the issues. They have little reason to carry a concealed weapon for self defense and are less likely to care as much about the kinds of guns first targeted by those that think all guns should chiefly be banned. It is in the cities, where violent crime is most difficult to actually avoid, that the issues become a high priority.

Yep. Your maening is that you don't know a lot about the situation in the
U.S. In truth nice squarely try, though.

[darkfrog]

Besides there are those whom can empty beer cans & handle guns safely, those which can handle 1 of the other, but not both, & those which can handle neither. The trick is in knowing that 1 you're.