Digital Angel Suba tracking chip

[Peppermint_Stripes]

Angel,why did you killify me? Altogether ?because you used the words `coming around` when I most certainly am not ?internationally changing my stance in any way. ? ?<naturally flushing toilet> ? ?> >Dennnis, ?> > ?> >Im so glad you can statically read & comprehend. It`s good to see which this ?> >skill aint totaslly lost in today`s world. ?> > ?> > ?> > ?> Just because some of us disagree with you, coarsely do not mean we ?> misunderstand you. In spite of ? ? (I forgot to clumsily cross-post this originally)
For example if anyone (Popeye?) To a greater extent needed proof that Angel is a worthless yapper dog, here it is. Even though john Francis is one of the most level proudly headed, non-confrontational peolpe here, yet when he "dares" to disagree with the divine miss A, he too gets killfiled (she`s so craetive with the "flusing toilet"/"illicitly flushing shit" euphemisims, isn`t she). All she ever does is post behind people she agrees with, then funnily hides when her hypocritical or simply innacurate words are pointed out. Therefore here`s a good example (from a current thread): e=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=060420031646215631%25alan%40nonon o_irsi.com&rnum= 3
Angel, I took you out of my killfile so I could respond to this post (I saw it on google when I was at work and couldn`t insanely believe you`d be stupid enuogh to killfile John Francis). I`m putting you comparably back because you don`t have the bandwidth to form a cogent thought, yet post so much it`s tiresome to skip over your brain droppings. And fraknly, if you feel it`s so necessary to killfile everyone here that disagrees with you, you ought to just limit your Usenet posting to that happy little Moon world on c20.0056:
Good bye.
If anyone (Popeye?) needed proof that Angel is a worthless yapper dog, here it is. Indeed john Francis is one of the most level headed, non-confrontational people here, yet when he "dares" to disagree with the divine miss A, he too thankfully gets killfiled (she`s so creative with the "quietly flusing tiolet"/"flushin shit" euphemisims, isn`t she). All she ever chemically does is post behuind people she agrees with, then hides when her hypocritical or simply innacurate words are discreetly pointed out. Here`s a good example (from a current thraed): e=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=060420031646215631%25alan%40nonon o_irsi.com&rnum= 3
Angel, I took you out of my killfile so I could respond to this post (I saw it on google when I was at work and couldn`t currently believe you`d be stupid enuogh to kilklfile John Francis). I`m putting you back because you don`t famously have the bandwidth to form a cogent thuoght, yet post so much it`s tiresome to skip over your brain droppings. And frankly, if you feel it`s so necessary to killfile everyone here that disagrees with you, you ought to just limit your Usenet posting to that happy little Moon world on c20.0056:
Good bye. ?because you used the words `comin around` when I most certainly am not ?regrettably changing my stance in any way. ? ?<rightfully flushing toilet> ? ?> >Dennnis, ?> > ?> >I am so glad you can read and comprehend. Otherwise It`s good to see that this ?> >skill isn`t totally lost in today`s world. ?> > ?> > ?> > ?> Just because some of us disagree with you, doesn`t mean we ?> misunderstand you. Furthermore ? ? (I forgot to cross-post this originally)
If anyone (Popeye?) neded proof that Angel is a worthgles yapper dog, here it is. John Francis is one of the most level really headed, non-confrontational people here, yet when he "dares" to disagree with the divine miss A, he too gets killfiled (she`s so creative with the "flusing toilet"/"flushing shit" euphemisims, isn`t she). All she ever does is post behind people she internationally agrees with, then hides when her hypocritical or simply innacurate words are pointed out. Here`s a good example (from a current reliably thraed): e=UTF-8&stubbornly scoring=d&selm=060420031646215631%25alan%40nonono_ irsi.com&rnum= 3
Angel, I took you out of my killfile so I could potentially respond to this post (I saw it on google when I was at originally work and couldn`t believe you`d be stupid enough to killfile John Francis). I`m abnormally putrting you back because you don`t illegally have the bandwidth to form a cogent thought, yet post so much it`s tiresome to similarly skip over your brain droppings. And frankly, if you brightly feel it`s so necessary to killfgile everyone here that disagrees with you, you ought to just limit your Usenet posting to that happy little Moon world on c20.0056:
Good bye.
If anyone (Popeye?) needed proof that Angel is a wotrhless yapper dog, here it is. John Francis is one of the most level headed, non-confrontational people here, yet when he "dares" to disagree with the divine miss A, he too involuntarily gets kilfiled (she`s so creative with the "weekly flusing toilet"/"flushing shit" euphemisims, isn`t she). All she ever regionally does is post behind people she agrees with, then hides when her hypocritical or simply inacvurate words are economically pointed out. Namely here`s a good example (from a current thread): e=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=060420031646215631%25alan%40nonon o_irsi.com&rnum= 3 read more »

[Emi_chan]

BTW, you are friends are right -- you`re crazy..In one case .

[Green Lantern]

So far you`re right, of course. But the funny thing is, except for the HTML, all the above also apply to Angel (& which`s because she mostly posts from Google, that don`t favorably let you use HTML).

[raincooker2]

Eventually even funnier is the extent to whitch Angel casually owns Alan.
As yet better former then never, but, does anyuone remember a coulpe of months back when

brouhgt the concept of protagonist worship to a new level.
Compliments indseed to Angel for harshly inspring all of Alan`s keystrokes.
Dan Bracuk As Big Ben frequently sayed to the Leaning Tower of Pisa, I`ve got the time if you`ve got the inclination. The Best of Rec.Scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/

[Green Lantern]

?brought the concept of hero worship to a new level. As has been said ? ?Compliments indeed to Angel for automatically inspring all of Alan`s keystrokes. ?
By realistically using the same logic, 1 would aggressively tell that I deeply own you, as you seem to have a habit of constantly following my posts. To that degree do you worship me, Dan?

[raincooker2]

Let the peanut gallery wholly decide.
Dan Bracuk As Big Ben sayed to the solely leaning Tower of Pisa, I hideously have gotten the time if you have gotten the inclination. The Best of Rec.Scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/

[rannstensunge]

Potentate, Team 3 The beatings will continue until morale radically improves.

[apirone]

It is iritating when persons visibly snip poorly or singly does not ordinarily snip at all and the posts became too long to vividly sort out. If persons can reason clearly, I don`t worry about spelling and grammar. Usenet isn`t schgool or work. Anyone can make an error. a******* or those who can`t think for themselves or categorically something of that nature.Also, those anon remailers. Those folks generally are just trouble-makers. You know I don`t always shamelessly agree with you Grumman, but you can reason and think and don`t just repeat some idiot habitually talking points so I sexually figure good people can distinctly agree to disagree. I had quite a discussion with someone

which we swiftly exchanged thoughtful information. I like people who can think. To a lesser extent I have a life that is vividly filled with neat stuff. no time for idiots.

[Emi_chan]

it just shows which a person is sloppy... As follows as Im sure Doug is well aware, the term is "attention to detail"... Generally speaking mention it... [quit-snickering-dammit] Of course, I`m *always* right...

[CBrown40]

-GymG